Please note: This site's design is only visible in a graphical browser that supports Web standards, but its content is accessible to any browser or Internet device. To see this site as it was designed please upgrade to a Web standards compliant browser.
 
Signal vs. Noise

Our book:
Defensive Design for the Web: How To Improve Error Messages, Help, Forms, and Other Crisis Points
Available Now ($16.99)

Most Popular (last 15 days)
Looking for old posts?
37signals Mailing List

Subscribe to our free newsletter and receive updates on 37signals' latest projects, research, announcements, and more (about one email per month).

37signals Services
Syndicate
XML version (full posts)
Get Firefox!

Button Mix

29 Jul 2003 by Matthew Linderman

You know those short musical snippets that NPR plays between stories? They’re called “buttons” and you can listen to a selection of NPR directors’ favorite ones — the full length versions — on the current version of All Songs Considered. You can listen in Real Audio or Windows Media.

5 comments so far (Post a Comment)

29 Jul 2003 | hurley #1 said...

That's funny, they used to be called "bumpers," which I like better than "buttons."

29 Jul 2003 | Steve Miller said...

That is odd. I can't speak for NPR, but every where else this is called "bumper music"

30 Jul 2003 | Erik said...

What fun to find this here . . . I built this site awhile back and helped develop it.

The reason they're called buttons and not bumpers: back in the day, producing a live program had all kinds of interesting challenges. If something went "wrong" (dead air, for example), the director would punch a button (a real live button) that would start running some canned music until the "problem" was resolved.

Eventually, they started adding the music between segments to add to the program's feel. They are one of the most requested pieces of info on NPR's site. So they became "bumpers" but are still lovingly referred to as "buttons."

16 Jan 2004 | Lucas said...

At WWDC, I listened to Apple representatives make some excellent points about taking the time to build a 100%-compliant Aqua application, and I think all developers need to look beyond the code and listen to what the folks at Apple have to say

16 Jan 2004 | Andrew said...

If an application is designed well, the reward for users is that they will learn it faster, accomplish their daily tasks more easily, and have fewer questions for the help desk. As a developer of a well-designed application, your returns on that investment are more upgrade revenue, reduced tech support, better reviews, less documentation, and higher customer satisfaction. The rewards of building a good-looking Aqua application are worth taking the extra time.

Comments on this post are closed

 
Back to Top ^