Another thing we learned was that…
Another thing we learned was…
We also learned that…
We also learned…
We learned…
You’re reading Signal v. Noise, a publication about the web by Basecamp since 1999. Happy !
Another thing we learned was that…
Another thing we learned was…
We also learned that…
We also learned…
We learned…
Rocky Erwin
on 05 Dec 10lolz
David
on 05 Dec 10This piece of writing is like a good poem. This piece of writing is like poetry. This piece of writing is poetry. This is poetry. Poetic.
NIck P.
on 05 Dec 10Jason must wish English was like other languages whose verbs have implied pronouns.
tutuca
on 05 Dec 10Right, this is one time spanish is more concise: aprendimos
Stephen Jenkins
on 05 Dec 10Is this one of those “figure out the next word in the sequence” games?
I propose: Eureka!
Preston
on 05 Dec 10Lard Factor: 77%.
markd
on 05 Dec 10I still remember a piece in Wired years ago about stories with only 6 words, inspired by one Hemingway did.
My favorite:
We went solar; sun went nova.
Check it out if you haven’t seen it:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.11/sixwords.html
Phil Willis
on 05 Dec 10Informative.
Thanks.
Kevin Evans
on 05 Dec 10I guess the class you’d like to teach is in session. Nice!
Berserk
on 05 Dec 10How is “We [also] learned” seen as more condensed (and, in this context implicitly better) than “We [also] learned that”?
The way I see it, “that” is one of many words that can follow “learned”: How, where, what, why, etc. Like:
We also learned that milk is best served cold. We also learned where milk comes from.
Why is “that” singled out?
I’m not a native speaker; the question not rhetorical.
Landon Ellis
on 06 Dec 10@Berserk, “that” is singled out because it is not really necessary (at least not always). For example, “We also learned that milk is best served cold” could be more concisely stated as “We learned milk is best served cold”. I think it becomes a matter of opinion as to which is more desirable.
Anonymous Coward
on 06 Dec 10So why don’t you twats tell us all what you learned instead of getting all Poetry 101 on us?
Peter Cooper
on 06 Dec 10@tutuca: Except “aprendimos” is the same number of characters as “we learned” ;-) But “we learnt” is shorter still, depending on your brand of English.
Scott
on 06 Dec 10@Berserk: As used in Jason’s post, “that” is an empty complementizer. More about them, including examples: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementizer#Empty_complementizers
Ron Stauffer, Jr
on 06 Dec 10Reminds me of the movie “A River Runs Through It,” where the boy brings his English paper to his Dad. Dad reads it, then tears in half and says “Good. Now make it half as long.”
Mark
on 06 Dec 10I like how much thought you guys put into every single word that goes on to your site!
I like how much thought you guys put into every single word!
I like!
Michael
on 06 Dec 10I’m learnding!
Austin Schneider
on 06 Dec 10The last sentence provides the same information as the first. A post on efficiency and simplicity that, in itself, is efficient and simplistic. I love it.
Don Douthitt
on 06 Dec 10I generally agree with the idea here, but I don’t think “we also learned…” and “we learned…” are the same. If you learned more than one thing and each one gets its own discussion then “also” is necessary at some point. “We learned (thing one). We also learned (thing two).” Right?
Mike Unwalla
on 06 Dec 10Another thing we learned was that X Another thing we learned was X We also learned that X We also learned X We learned X X
Wytze
on 06 Dec 10Lesson:...
Alex
on 06 Dec 10Thanks for post; now see light. My writing better!
Grouch
on 06 Dec 10Poetry? Come on fanboys, get some perspective!
Jeff Lam
on 06 Dec 10Minimalistic, I like.
Easy NOT.
On a serious note, I believe the issue isn’t always about reducing the number of words. Rather, it ought to be using the RIGHT amount of words.
james
on 06 Dec 10Omit needless words.
Berserk
on 06 Dec 10@Landon & Scott: Thanks! I’ll read that Wikipedia article.
Ryan theJenks
on 06 Dec 10Twitter has helped me a lot with this skill. I’ll often write full replies and then edit them down to
The final result is always much better than the first.
Hibiscus
on 06 Dec 10The only circumstance I can think of where “We also learned that” would be better than “We also learned” or “We learned” is if you were trying to get the whole line to be in iambic pentameter: “We also learned that da, da da, da dah.”
Joe
on 06 Dec 10I like your style Jason. Have you read William Zinsser by any chance?
Joe
on 06 Dec 10Correction.
Read William Zinsser by chance?
Matt
on 06 Dec 10I recently finished reading the wonderful Maira Kalman-illustrated edition of Strunk & White’s Elements of Style. What you did here is very much in line with their advice. It’s a great read and I’m sure you guys would love it.
Erik
on 06 Dec 10Elements of Style and Zinsser’s On Writing Well are great resources for learning how to pare your texts.
I need to point out that removing “also” in the last iteration intrinsically changes the meaning of the phrase, when it’s in context. Perhaps the previous sentence was “The data informed us the site had many visits.” Putting “We also learned…” after that connects this sentence with “the data” of the previous sentence. Using “We learned…” could mean that this is hooked to “the data” or it could build off the “many visits” or even something stated later in the sentence.
In other words, I feel “We also learned…” is the smallest atom you can distill from the initial phrase without losing meaning.
Anonymous Coward
on 07 Dec 10working now more as a function of creating multi-functional clothing Peaches and pink colored clothing suit women with lighter skin tones" Its the delayed wave of financial disaster ugg boots washing over export-based economies now mens jackets uk affected by the downturn in importing regions such as the United States and Europe Other specilaised sectors included World of Fashion Accessories, Infant & Childrens wear, Bridal and Evening wear, Fabrics & Yarn, cheap uggs Sewing Supplies, Fashion Gallery as ugg australia sale well as International Fashion Designers Showcase, each of which was brimming with the latest styles from talented designers ladies winter coats from Hong Kong, China as well from Indonesia and KoreaJ Thus a strong pulse to ugg australia sale uk acknowledge is Couture ugg boots uk meets Prt drive fuelled by the increasing demand for designer fashion at reasonable costs Last years show was much ugg boots uk better, said Mandy Chan, a merchandiser for the Zhejiang Seven Fortune Group, which manufactures sweaters in China for apparel companies such as Chicos, Guess? Inc You could experiment with this trend if you have a number of denim Womens clothing inyour wardrobe Nowadays, a combination of Indian ethnic with western touches ugg boots sale uk is in vogue Whether you’d like to go on a formal moncler jackets uk meeting or spend a night out with your buddies, this patent handbag goes perfectly with any occasion; smooth or funk Women now select their bags watching celebrity stylesHuge repertoires ugg australia sale uk of bridal wears are available in the market, in an array of colors, designs, and prices to suit the choice and budget bailey button of every moncler jackets uk shopper Another blast from the past are fringes Indian designers like Gitanjali ugg australia uk Kashyap, Rohit Bal and others uggs outlet frequently participate in fashion shows abroad Fashion is
Hamid
on 08 Dec 10It’s like a very splendid poeo indeed.
Scott Magoon
on 08 Dec 10Can I just say that this is something that basically I really love a lot.
Love it.
Sam
on 09 Dec 10I don’t get it.
This discussion is closed.