In Beautiful Evidence, Edward Tufte says, “If you’re running a business, figure out how to pack a huge amount of information onto a single 11×17” sheet of paper and print it out on a laserprinter, then give it to decision makers. With that one sheet of paper, they will have as much information as 15 computer screenfuls or 300 PowerPoint slides.”
So why don’t more web sites do this? Occasionally you’ll see a dedicated one-page takeaway sheet (Left: Regonline offers a “One-Page Brochure” PDF in the sidebar). But usually a crappy print job is the best a visitor can do. That just doesn’t pack the same punch.
There’s an underlying issue here: Site builders often assume the person visiting a site is the one who actually makes the call on purchasing decisions. In real world business settings, that’s not always the way it works. The person who signs the checks often isn’t the most web savvy person or is too busy/apathetic to really dig into nitty gritty site details.
One-sheeters like Regonline’s can be left on the boss’ desk. In a lot of places, that can be the difference between being ignored and getting in the game.
Inspiration is like picking up one of those blinky things in a video game that makes you invincible for awhile. You can do anything, go anywhere, and you don’t have to worry about it.
Those blinky things exist in real life too. It may be a picture, or some words, or a sound, or a idea, or a mistake, or a moment. Whatever it is, pick it up and run with it. Run with it like you stole it.
You can’t bottle up inspiration. You can’t put it in a ziplock, toss it in the freezer, and fish it out later. It’s instantly perishable if you don’t eat it while it’s fresh.
On Friday I was inspired by a few things. I swore off the weekend and dove into it. And I got about 2 weeks of work done in 24 hours. Inspiration is a time machine.
Inspiration is a magical thing, a productivity multiplier, a motivator. But it won’t wait for you. Inspiration is a now thing. If it grabs you, grab it right back and put it to work.
NewsDesigner reports that one of the newspaper industry’s responses to sagging ad sales is adscapes.
‘Adscapes’ are the latest look in newspaper advertising. No longer are newspaper ads relegated to squares and rectangles. Today, advertisers can attract attention with a variety of shapes and sizes.
More examples in this PDF.
The thread features some designers complaining about the trend but commenter Robert Kruger counters:
Why do you think ad reps find it hard to sell the space they already have? Because newspapers are BORING. These new ads are an attempt to change that, to bring a little STYLE into a space dominated by little people stuck in their little boxes. Newspaper subscriptions aren’t down simply because of the internet, bad writing, and bias, they’ve also gone down because of the rigid aesthetic thought, as shown by the designers kvetching here.
This week’s Time magazine features a brief shoutout to 37signals as one of “Five hot sites to watch” and calls our products “elegant” and “easy to use.” It’s in a sidebar to The Next YouTubes article but since the sidebar isn’t shown in the online version of the story, here’s a look.
Related: 30boxes, also mentioned in the story, wonders why Google is slow to respond to the piece: “One would imagine that Time would be quickly included in Google News and then echo out from there, but 48 hours later, searching Google news won’t lead you to the Time article.”
In part three, our designers discuss recommended books and who/what’s overrated (e.g. Jonathan Ive, Getting Real, 2advanced, blog celebrities) and underrated (Nazarin Hamid, Jared Christiansen, Eric Jordan, scrolling).
Matt |
For all: Name one book every designer should own and/or one that everyone should own (designer or not). |
Ryan |
|
Ryan |
by Oscar Wilde |
Greg |
Hmmm |
Greg |
I’ve got 250 books on the shelf… hard to choose one |
Dan |
|
Jason |
|
Ryan |
|
Dan |
Ryan just earned himself a beer |
Ryan |
Cha-ching. |
Jason |
|
Greg |
BWD is good but I thought HTML 3.1 was better |
Greg |
:) |
Jason |
snap! |
Dan |
lol |
Ryan |
Zinging abounds. |
Greg |
|
Greg |
it’s an encyclopedia of good practices for online design |
Dan |
|
Greg |
|
Jason |
It seriously is |
Continued…
Digg
Alex Foley on Digg’s “While you’re waiting, add your profile”:
Excellent way to avoid having a longer signup form. I filled out the second part without even thinking.
The Nonist
The Nonist blog gets aquatic/literal with its anchor icon.
Others Online
Joel writes:
I was looking at the Others Online product tour and found these two screens. They say: “Registering is easy! It’s not like those other sites where you have to add a bunch of content. Yeah, you just have to enter a screen name, password, birthdate, gender, country, postal code, email address, a friend’s email address…And then upload an image, type in your interests, your tagline and your various web addresses. Sure, it is (unfortunately) fairly standard to ask for all that on registration pages, but what’s interesting is that they claim to be very simple and better than “those other sites”.
Got an interesting screenshot for Signal vs. Noise? Send the image and/or URL to svn [at] 37signals [dot] com.
We’ve been very hard at work overhauling and improving the tools on your Backpack pages. In the next few weeks we’ll release these new features, but first we wanted to give you a little preview of one of the major changes.
Once we release this update you’ll be able to move any list, note, image, file, etc. around on the page. You can put a note at the top, then a list, then a file, then another note, then a list, then another list, then a photo gallery, etc. You’ll be able to organize a page any way you’d like.
Check out this quick demo.
Stay tuned. We think you’ll like the improvements we have in store. They’re coming soon.
Wallflower at the Web Party details the rise and fall of Friendster. Though there’s a lot of finger pointing in the story, there’s also a lot to learn from the site’s bust. Some excerpts:
Founder Jonathan Abrams vows to never again accept a dime in venture capital.
Mr. Abrams believed that he had developed a sound business plan for building Friendster into an Internet powerhouse — and that the plan foundered when his well-known investors shoved him aside and proceeded to mess everything up…’Jonathan had all these high-powered investors to please. He had all this money in the bank, so there was all this pressure to hire people and get things done. Open up new territories: China, Japan, Germany. Add all these new features. Meantime, he took his eye off the ball.’
The company spent too much time worrying about new features instead of the poor performance of its existing site:
As Friendster became more popular, its overwhelmed Web site became slower. Things would become so bad that a Friendster Web page took as long as 40 seconds to download…[Yet] technical difficulties proved too pedestrian for a board of this pedigree. The performance problems would come up, but the board devoted most of its time to talking about potential competitors and new features, such as the possibility of adding Internet phone services, or so-called voice over Internet protocol, or VoIP, to the site.
And they made the mistake of trying to solve exciting potential problems instead of real mundane ones.
In retrospect, Mr. Lindstrom said, the company needed to devote all of its resources to fixing its technological problems. But such are the appetites of companies fixated on growing into multibillion-dollar behemoths. They seek to run even before they can walk. “Friendster was so focused on becoming the next Google,” Professor Piskorski said, “that they weren’t focused on fixing the more mundane problems standing in the way of them becoming the next Google.”
More mistake stories:
Evan Williams: How Odeo Screwed Up
Actual lessons from Kiko
The top five mistakes entrepreneurs make when they market
Paul Graham’s list of 18 mistakes
Long live creative advertising.
(via ifun.ru)